How I was murdered in my own home and lived to pay for it.

Etsy.com And Laura Wamelink Haggarty Market Images Of My Child Abuse.

Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Laura Wamelink Haggarty Laura Wamelink Haggarty Laura Wamelink Haggarty Katy Dids Cards Laura Wamelink Haggarty Resume Laura Wamelink Haggarty Resume Laura Wamelink Haggarty Resume


Even worse, I now discover that images of me relating to the child abuse are being SOLD online and made to misrepresent the problems overall as well as to obscure and replace my identity with that of someone else. That being a long dead French boy.

This is basically an attempt to offer "Safe Harbor" for the felons who did this to me and likely others.

From their web advertisement marketing the image:

"This modern greeting card shows us a little boy and his rooster. He is sitting on a stool smoking a cigarette, while next to him a chicken almost as big as he is stands. The cock bird appears to be a Poulet de Bresse, and is wearing a leg band. The boy is named Henry Groulx. It is a reproduction of a vintage photograph by the Parisian Studio, Paris, France, circa 1920.

This image's copyright is owned by Library and Archives Canada, and is used by permission, reproduction reference number C-036255, and under the MIKAN ID number 3194087. We purchased the rights to use this image from L&A, and are (as far as we can tell) the only seller of this image who has done so, this image is not in the public domain."

That is inaccurate in total.

Doing a Google search for the other photo of me having been burned in the face with cigars and cigarettes in my "smoking jacket" with my parents when I was a child led me to find this image of me.

This was done professionally when I was a child and I recall the event completely and being dressed up like this, with my mother styling my hair this way and me having to wear these sissy shoes and the smock. This was NOT done at our home 233 Washington Street Wilson NY 14172 USA like the one done by burning my face with the police friends of my father being there and me in my smoking jacket, this was likely in Lockport since we had to drive there.

I have a problem with my image being used and marketed this way.

From the Etsy.com and KatyDidsCards storefront there:

https://www.etsy.com/li....20boy&ref=sr_gallery_2

https://www.etsy.com/sh....?ref=l2-about-shopname

[...

This modern greeting card shows us a little boy and his rooster. He is sitting on a stool smoking a cigarette, while next to him a chicken almost as big as he is stands. The cock bird appears to be a Poulet de Bresse, and is wearing a leg band. The boy is named Henry Groulx. It is a reproduction of a vintage photograph by the Parisian Studio, Paris, France, circa 1920.

This image's copyright is owned by Library and Archives Canada, and is used by permission, reproduction reference number C-036255, and under the MIKAN ID number 3194087. We purchased the rights to use this image from L&A, and are (as far as we can tell) the only seller of this image who has done so, this image is not in the public domain.

You can choose to have this card in black and white or sepia tone, with a glossy or matte surface, and with or without a matching 1.5" envelope sticker/seal. Simply make your selections from the pulldown menus when you make your purchase.

This image is available as a print in our store here:

https://www.etsy.com/li....okes-a-cigarette-print

As a set of eight stickers/envelope seals here:

https://www.etsy.com/li....stickers-child-smokes?

As a magnet in our store here:

https://www.etsy.com/li....oy-magnet-child-smokes

As a pack of bookplates here:

https://www.etsy.com/li....bookplates-pack-of-ten

And as a fabric block in our sister store here:

https://www.etsy.com/li....oy-fabric-block-smokes

Our cards are all 5" x 7" inches, (unfolded they measure 7" x 10") printed on heavy weight, 11ml cover cardstock, blank inside. Each card comes with an envelope. The image will have a colored border applied, with the image centered in the card and a white border around it, as shown in the samples picture above. Please note that vintage image sizes vary, and are not optimized for modern frames (in case you are buying the card with an eye to framing it.)

We make our cards from vintage images from our personal collection (we've been collecting ephemera for over 40 years.) We scan the originals, and then clean and repair the damage that time has done to the original using Photoshop. We then print them using a high resolution printer at 600 DPI. The resulting card is deeply saturated, and guaranteed to please.

Note any watermark showing is on the scan only, not the item itself. All images and design elements are protected by copyright. Copyright is not transferable with the sale of this product. The buyer is not entitled to reproduction rights.

END QUOTE ETSY DOT COM

So this has some other connections for my personal vanity:

"Shall Not Reproduce"

"Eugenics"

"Reproduction Rights"

"The buyer is not entitled to reproduction rights."

Neither are you since it is my image and you have no permission to use it....

It is actually a very disrespectful depiction and the implications of the scenario are in bad taste and advocates harms to children.

This is actually a fraud in total since this is a photo of me done by my parents and some other persons in Western NY State circa 1964. Not of someone longer ago in France.

My parents are and were horridly abusive sexually and physically to me and engaged in actual acts of murder, done to me and others, sexual abuse and making of images of that abuse, and other violence and atrocity done to me and others.

I recall this event in particular and believe we were told the chicken that I thought was a dog and petted it, is a "Jersey Giant".

So the article is wrong, this is a FEMALE Jersey Giant and not a rooster as the description indicates.

The point is that the image itself is of me, and the image and the associated paraphernalia connote an obvious set of problems.

From:

http://nationaljerseygi....om/index.cfm/pageid/22

[...

How big do Giants get?

Giants are the largest purebred chicken. The weight of mature roosters is 11 to 15 pounds and they are usually 22 to 26 inches tall. Mature hens 9 to 11 pounds and usually 16 to 20 inches tall.
...]

This looks to be a form of collusion since this misrepresents the reality of the problem and this image overall being of me and the abuse ongoing.

This in effect supports the child rapes and other harms by "covering" them up.

---
From Etsy.com, about the owner of KatyDidsCards:

[...
Laura Wamelink Haggarty Owner, Maker, Designer, Curator

I have a BFA in Photography, and have always loved art and books. I live on a farm in northern Kentucky with my family, where we have horses, goats, chickens, and bees. I love reading, the ocean, birding, old movies, and chocolate in all forms.

A Thing of Beauty is a Joy Forever...

I started my greeting card business in 2008 (although I've been an ephemera dealer on and off since 1998.) In my shop you'll find greeting cards, prints, bookplates, magnets, bookmarks, and stickers made from vintage images as well as from my own photographs.

The vintage source items I use were collected by my mother and me over the last 40 years. They include postcards, Victorian trade cards, children's books, and other ephemera. Mom always wanted to open a small greeting card store of her own one day, using the images from her antique items. Sadly, she passed away before the tech was good enough to do so.

But now it is, and I am making my mom's dream into a reality with KatyDids Cards (the title comes from her favorite book as a child, "What Katy-Did.")

I'm living my dream, (and my mom's) with this business, and hope you'll find our items and images unique and fun.

If there's anything in particular you'd like to see that you think I might have, Convo me and I'll dig through the boxes to see if I can find it!

And be sure to check out our sister store here on Etsy, KatyDids Fabrics, where you'll find fabric blocks made from the same vintage images I work with here:

http://www.etsy.com/shop/KatyDidsFabrics

I also sell vintage items on Etsy here: https://www.etsy.com/shop/KatyDidsVintage

Our home is smoke-free and always has been, but as you can see, we do have pets (in case you have allergies.) Thanks for stopping by.

...]

---

Laura Wamelink Haggarty

https://www.facebook.com/laura.wamelink.haggarty

[...
Farmwife, lover of fine wine &food, freelance writer, ephemera dealer, natmed enthusiast.

PathfindersFarm@gmail.com

http://www.pathfindersfarm.com/index.html
...]

There is an obvious military connection here with this person and this looks to be an effort to remove my ability to display my image of this abuse via their bogus copyright by proxy claims.

It also looks to be a way to anti-victimize me with this image and to remove my identity and witness by that.

This is done to obfuscate.

Point again is Laura Wamelink Haggarty's want to claim she paid for the use of this photo to some concern in Canada does not validate the acts as such. That being she has no right to use my image OR TO PROFIT FROM IT.

Nor does this concern in Canada.

This person is doing this intentionally in protection of my parents and their friends in the Police and US Defense Department since there is too much of my vanity within this problem. She is aware this is me and my image AND my father spoke to this long ago circa 1998.

This IS about child pornography and the want to blame the child victims.

You can not profit from these crimes done to me in this way and my image, same applies to the pornographic images you made with my sister and I as children.

It is a miracle I was not murdered on the way home from this "photo session" done to make this image.

More resources for this woman, she looks like some kind of "Messiah" eesh....

http://twitter.com/pathfindersfarm

http://farmwifesdiary.blogspot.com/

http://mizgreenjeans.wordpress.com/

http://katydidscards.wordpress.com/

http://peacockwithstuffing.wordpress.com/

http://www.urbanchicken....t.com/ucp-episode-011/

http://www.facebook.com....canBuckeyePoultryClub/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/laurawamelinkhaggarty

https://plus.google.com....1042317613975041/posts

https://www.facebook.co....017984774750/timeline/

More From:

http://www.exscite.org/....ura-wamelink-haggarty/

[...

Laura Wamelink Haggarty (STA ExScite) has found her calling.

Pathfinders Farm is headed up by James and Laura. Nineteen years of marriage, two children, and many moves later we're finally settled on our own farm. We focus primarily on horses and poultry, but still have two dairy goat wethers left over from our former herd. If you're looking for quality purebred poultry, excellent free-range eggs, or instruction in barefoot hoof trimming, give us a shout.

Laura has a part-time business doing genealogy research for folks, so if you're interested in having her track down your ancestors, find a missing relative, birth certificate, or probate record, just give her a shout, she's getting pretty good at it all. She's also done volunteer work for various non-profits and other groups for 35 years.

Click here to see their farm's website and friends:

http://www.pathfindersfarm.com/index.html

...]

Even more bizzare:

http://www.exscite.org/about/

[...

What is this ExScite thing?

Introduction

For more than 30 years, Scitex former employees have populated key positions in several strategic high-tech industries. Walking around in trade shows, reading industry magazines, running at airport terminals or just plainly looking for connections, you are almost certain to bump into an ex-Scitex person. The ExScite Web site was designed to provide all of us with a good personal networking tool in Cyberspace, free of time and geography limitations.

The ExScite Mission

The ExScite is a non-profit organization established by, and for, the employees of Scitex, who are no longer with the company. Its mission is to establish and maintain an up-to date database in Cyberspace, accessible by the members around the world, for their own use. As Scitex goes through the business cycles, current employees can also rely on ExScite to support them with information and connections, as they plan their next career move.

What's in it for you?

...]

This looks to be some kind of shill organization or pseudo technology club she is a member of etc.

Her information from:

https://www.mylife.com/....aggarty/laura_haggarty

Laura Haggarty Berry, KY

Even more odd, her resume in France and French?

http://www.yatedo.fr/p/....9a0298f25d920e029ba5ae

http://www.whitepages.c....garty/Berry-KY/1v4jgei

Laura S Haggarty Age: 55-59 (December 2015)
Phone number 859-654-1407
12417 Highway 330 W Berry, KY 41003-8452

--

It all gets back to this resume thing again, with Heike, the degree frauds from SUNY Buffalo, the child harms, the fact Heike speaks English, French, and German, with her tossing her resume in the trunk of her 2002 Buick Regal post efforts to murder me and soaking it all with water making a mess.

An effort to accuse me of their crimes and frauds. And Heike was part of that so is SUNY Buffalo and this woman Laura Wamelink Haggarty.

SUNY knew I was Stateless, had me living with those who had MURDERED ME, they lied about transfer credits from Clarkson College, took money in student loans, etc.

---

Hello,

It seems as though I am repeating myself and ALL of this information has been provided to you already.

So here we go again in response to your email:

From your latest email to me:

- Clarification as to what intellectual property rights you believe are being infringed (such as trademark or copyright).

Again this person is misrepresenting this image in total since it is actually an image or photo taken of ME PERSONALLY when I was a child in Western NY State circa 1965.

She is marketing it via her website and via Facebook and links that refer to it on Facebook.

- A description of the exact content that you believe infringes your rights as well as information reasonably sufficient to permit us to locate it. Either provide a link leading directly to the specific content you are trying to report or, if a link isn't available, a detailed description of where it appears on the site, including names of responsible users, dates/times, and/or quotes or descriptions of the content at issue.

Here again is a copy of the image of ME (Terry Allen Jones) and a Jersey Giant hen.

https://www.etsy.com/li....20boy&ref=sr_gallery_2

https://www.facebook.com/laura.wamelink.haggarty

- A description of how you believe this material infringes or violates the specific legal rights named above.

She has NO permission to use my image this way AND she is not accurately representing the image. This is done ALONG with other efforts to "tamper with" or otherwise dilute and negate the image itself, the abuse OF ME that it represents, and is made along with other offers to slur my name in doing so. See the portion about her resume being posted online in French only. These are vanity based slurs made of me personally and I do not know this person at all. This is done to protect those who harmed me as a child and adult.

She also is misrepresenting the Canadian copyright agencies with her claim she has made a trademark application and payment to them for this content. This image is of ME and they being Laura Wamelink Haggarty and any or all others including Canada have no permission to use.

I am revoking any and all rights to my image(s).

Terry Jones

Hello,

I am disputing right to use and ownership of this image of me taken when I was a child in Western NY circa 1965. Here is some of the ongoing dialog with Facebook and their property team.

This photo is of me Terry Allen Jones:

http://collectionscanad....ng=eng&rec_nbr=3194087

Terry Jones

--

This is a perfect vanity trap for Laura Wamelink Haggarty --

From their web advertisement marketing the image:

"This modern greeting card shows us a little boy and his rooster. He is sitting on a stool smoking a cigarette, while next to him a chicken almost as big as he is stands. The cock bird appears to be a Poulet de Bresse, and is wearing a leg band. The boy is named Henry Groulx. It is a reproduction of a vintage photograph by the Parisian Studio, Paris, France, circa 1920.

This image's copyright is owned by Library and Archives Canada, and is used by permission, reproduction reference number C-036255, and under the MIKAN ID number 3194087. We purchased the rights to use this image from L&A, and are (as far as we can tell) the only seller of this image who has done so, this image is not in the public domain."

That is inaccurate in total.

She claims she is an expert in this manner and is not since they knew a woman would do this to me once more:

The bird is Jersey Giant and is a hen not a cock. Laura has that wrong.

I am sitting on a chair and not a stool and the bird has a "cock ring" attached to the right leg.

And the bird is actually sitting on my right.

Laura Wamelink Haggarty does not claim this image is of her so she has no claim and would not need Canada to make that or prove it as such.

Canada has no claim to the image since they have no witness and neither does Laura Wamelink Haggarty who has the date of image wrong and the name of the boy wrong.

None of you can dispute my claim since this is of me and I have witness and you have none.

Canada has no right to use, to copyright, or to market and neither do YOU, nor does Laura Wamelink Haggarty.

I revoke all rights to the image and content.

Facebook, Laura Wamelink Haggarty, Etsy, Libaries and Archives Canada, and others are wrong.

Terry Jones

--
It all gets back to this resume thing again, with Heike, the degree frauds from SUNY Buffalo, the child harms, the fact Heike speaks English, French, and German, with her tossing her resume in the trunk of her 2002 Buick Regal post efforts to murder me and soaking it all with water making a mess.

An effort to accuse me of their crimes and frauds. And Heike was part of that so is SUNY Buffalo and this woman Laura Wamelink Haggarty.

SUNY knew I was Stateless, had me living with those who had MURDERED ME, they lied about transfer credits from Clarkson College, took money in student loans, etc.

---

Get this, brother of Kenneth Morris Banks III (John Banks) "You are in the archives."

Response from Libraries and Archives Canada on February 04, 2016:

Dear Mr. Jones,

Reference: Portrait of Henri Groulx MIKAN number: 3194087

Thank you very much for your email dated 15th December 2015 regarding the above-noted image.

As a result of your email a professional archivist with Library and Archives Canada (LAC), a specialist in photographic media, was assigned to investigate the history of the photograph. The specialist examined the original photograph to determine its age, and also researched the provenance of how the photograph became part of our collection. As a result of these examinations and investigations LAC has determined that photo we have is the original (received from the photographer), and that this photo was taken in the 1920's at the Parisian Studio in Lachine, Quebec. The evidence is incontrovertible.

Also we appreciate your advising us of the use of this image by third parties who are selling it commercially on the internet. However, the LAC is not in legal position to prevent the reproduction and sale of this image, as the copyright in the image has expired, and it is now in the public domain (according to the Canadian Copyright legislation). The lack of copyright protection means we cannot prevent it being reproduced and used by individuals.

Thank you again for alerting us to this matter, and we hope the facts regarding this image in our collection is helpful to you.

Reference Services Division
395, Wellington, Ottawa ON Canada K1A 0N4
Library and Archives Canada / Government of Canada

Division des Services de references
395, Wellington, Ottawa ON Canada K1A 0N4
Bibliotheque et Archives Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

END QUOTE

This admits guilt on the part of Canada since this was never theirs to market to others and admits the fact we are lied to about this image being French to begin with but really we see now it is actually of me.

So with that they admit now public domain which is also false.

So this proves me right.

Etsy.com and Katy Dids Cards Boy With Chicken Photo Of Terry Allen Jones As A Boy Peril Magazine Pulp Fiction Cover December 1957 Peril Magazine Pulp Fiction Contents December 1957


My Chicken Boy Photo:

Every aspect of this photo of me with the chicken is engineered to mean something related to vanity of abuse and torture and murder done to me as of that date. I was only 5 years old or so at this time.

Features overall:

The photo is "ReTouched" proving it a fraud. This is about touching children in inappropriate ways of course.

Chicken, is a Jersey Giant Hen and not a Cock or male. Such large breeds were certainly not likely to be found in Europe in the 1920's as Libraries and Archives Canada states.

I was raped as a child and photos were taken by my parents and their police friends. For some of those sessions I was dressed and treated as a girl.

My mother is involved in that along with later harms to my sister even as an infant.

The ring on the ankle of the chicken is intentional. Relates to me being hung, cock ring, sexual innuendo, and harms my parents made to cripple me by cutting my foot with broken glass and harming my ankles.

I was hung with a rope execution style with my hands tied behind my back and ligature wounds exist today and are visible on my upper chest from me nearly ending up dead from that event.

The smock with pearl in my throat, the white dot, and fact it was so tight around my neck is allegory for that as well and fact my mother is a cosmetologist and her smocks are of that ilk and they tie in the back.

The arms are crossed and I am looking angry, as directed, relates to hot cross buns where my mother and father removed my diaper as an infant in the kitchen and poured boiling hot oil into my anus. I had to be hospitalized likely revived and doctor questioned my parents who claimed diaper rash.

The hand is missing which is a multi entendre, nobody helped me, and my father burned my hand on the hot burner of their electric stove in the kitchen.

The cigarette is also a multi entendre, I was burned in my face with cigars and cigarettes by my father and his Police friends, photos were taken as I was told to put on my smoking jacket, a Playboy Hugh Hefner slur. It is positioned exactly to represent that image in the older Pulp Fiction Cover and also to cover up a mole on the side of my face.

The mole being covered is another allegory to me being buried along with what likely was other dead children in a dirt grave in a field somewhere in Wilson NY. I played dead as dirt was shoveled on top of me and I waited until they had gone. I essentially swam my way up in the loose dirt to return home to ask if I could stay.

This also relates to the drowning event in mouth of Niagara River in Lake Ontario in Welland Ontario Canada where my mother and father drowned me and left me dead in the water.

People wonder how such a thing is possible and fact I could not recall much of this, basically I never had a chance or choice. You have to forget the child harms to move on and to reside there, you are forced by State who is doing this also, and later my parents did not discuss things in front of me any longer. I was not involved in them harming other people and they just made efforts to harm me using other people behind my back.

At some point the abuse led again to murder as in 1981 and the vivisection attack and this all serves them to keep me in a state of trauma that makes it all but impossible to look back.

This is a recent as of early 2017, photo that shows where the rope scarred my neck and throat as I realized I had to escape this problem as I suffocated essentially to death again. At the last minute I inverted, got my feet over my head into the rafters, slipped the noose by dangling there jerking it around to later drop to the floor and walk upstairs with my hands tied behind my back to ask dad if I could stay...

Terry Allen Jones Childhood Ligature Strangulation Execution By Hanging Wounds Streetcar Merchants of Fried Chicken, Doughnuts & Coffee Chicken Boy Mural


Also seen @ “Streetcar Merchants of Fried Chicken, Doughnuts & Coffee”
4002 30th St, San Diego, CA 92104

-- Who has a large mural of this photo on their wall.

Google Maps Photo

Paye - North Park Location:

http://www.streetcarmerchants.com

This IS legitimately a photo of me.

That is odd yes. My attorney Jon Louis Wilson of Lockport NY alluded to that then with his non sequitur "A streetcar named desire".

Jon ended up conspiring with my wife and parents who harmed me...


I am better remembering the event where my parents poured hot cooking oil onto my genitals and anus when I was an infant. I recall being carried from my crib wearing my diaper and placed face down on the kitchen table. My father was discussing with my mother how they can maybe cauterize my anus and keep me from pooping and maybe I will die and they can say it grew that way. This went on while they removed my diaper.

So as discussed, oil was poured onto me and I remember my father making fun of me for the fact I was wailing and screaming and crying now and then they got it hotter and poured even more onto me. I recall the room getting really bright and then I likely died.

Later I must have been revived in the hospital, not knowing how I came to be there and from what I now see the nurses and doctors were very savvy. The doctor discussed in front of me with my parents what had been done. My father indicated that this was some kind of rash and they had placed cream or oil onto the area to soothe it.

The doctor laughed at him and said this is of course false, these are second and third degree burns likely made with hot cooking oil, and that this caused my death and he had to revive me and it was difficult. He went on to say little babies and people are not cars and we don't do this and then expect to just user jumper cables and start them up again. And that likely you can be charged for this death. My father announced some amount of privilege knowing Police in the area etc and the doctor said this is of no use or interest to him.

I was not provided a birth name and they knew this of course and doctors and nurses kept visiting me and telling me over and over again "You have no name, your parents are Ethel and Thomas Jones from Wilson NY, You are at Mount Saint Mary's Hospital, they did something wrong, you will know what this means later..... You have no name, your parents a....."

They were right, I recall all of it now.

Mount Saint Mary's Hospital
5300 Military Rd Lewiston, NY 14092 +1-716-297-4800

http://www.chsbuffalo.org/Facilities/Hospitals/MountStMarysHospital

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Saint_Mary's_Hospital


These sites also abuse and misuse the image of me:


https://www.etsy.com/li....hoto-keychain-cigarette


https://www.etsy.com/li....-child-smokes-cigarette


https://www.etsy.com/li....moking-smokes-cigarette


https://en.dawanda.com/....g-cigarette-photo-print


https://www.pinterest.com/pin/431712314253285371/


https://www.pinterest.com/pin/563090759629516315/


http://insanepics.blogs....g-boy-with-chicken.html


https://www.zazzle.com/....hirt-235211454882355491


http://all-that-is-interesting.com/kids-smoking


https://www.buzzfeed.co....and-his-pet-chicken-mdv


https://thebyronicman.c....the-creepy-smoking-kid/


https://www.etsy.com/li....ph?ref=shop_home_feat_1


Haggarty would have to know she can't redact or remove witness about others as well just since a page mentions her.

Her effort as predicted will entail her want to remove my witness and to discredit it. As the page and site is about more than her.


Henri Groulx (21 May 1888 – 16 July 1952) was a Canadian pharmacist and politician.

Henri Groulx (21 May 1888 – 16 July 1952) was a Canadian pharmacist and politician.


Laura Wamelink Haggarty makes this retort to my report:

-------------BEGIN QUOTE-------------
#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Absolute insane falsehoods
AUTHOR: Laura - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, September 07, 2017

None of what this person is posting about me is true. He tried posting this insane nonsense on his own website and when I complained his ISP had the page taken down.

I did nothing wrong. I did not do any of the things he accuses me of.

I purchased the rights to use the image in question from the Library and Archives Canada, who own the original image, which is from a Parisian photographer and which was taken in 1920.

The image has nothing to do with this person. It is not of him. I do not know him. He refuses to use his real name because he knows I will sue him for character defamation. He uses a false name on his ISP registration, a mail drop mailing address, and the ISP is in Cyprus (despite his mailing info being in Texas.)

This person is doxxing me, posting my address and phone number. Totally wrong and potentially illegal.

This is totally false. Please remove this immediately.
-------------END QUOTE-------------

My first reply to her offer, seeing how she admits guilt now with it:

To begin with, Laura would be better served to refrain from using slurs and ad hominem.

The word insane need not be in her rebuttal at all. Since now she proves me right with her own word.

Laura does not know me at all and can not speak to the nature of my person at all, let alone claim "Insane".

This is where this is supposed to go for Laura. Making slurs of people who are victims of crime.

Her initial offer is wrong:

"#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company Absolute insane falsehoods"

"None of what this person is posting about me is true. He tried posting this insane nonsense on his own website and when I complained his ISP had the page taken down."

The word insane is used again for no reason. Her only hope to defend now is to accuse me of being INSANE. An ISP can not act on YOUR word to remove pages based on your say so certainly when my pages are accurate. They (The ISP) did no such thing and I have no complaint from you. Laura has no witness there either, since she is not in Greece or Europe. And has no witness of my act either.

YOU should have contacted me and not hoped to use someone as a proxy again to get away or to do your dirty work for you Laura. You will need to make a formal charge Laura against me personally. But again an offense is not a good defense since you have no defense. Right Laura?

Your new offers are also false Laura. And you hope to use that to defend your acts, it does not. I suggest you call the Police and see what they can do for you since you feel so strongly about something you can't prove and have no witness of. And they and Canada have no jurisdiction on the matter. Good luck.

My pages mirror your offers of what you do online, they are factually correct, and you can not do anything about that. You confess to that here and now. To the want to appease you, nobody can do that for you Laura since you are wrong. Neither can an ISP. If you want to make a claim then you'd need to seek a court action to remove or redact information. You can't do so for the reasons I've put forth already.

"I did nothing wrong. I did not do any of the things he accuses me of. "

Yes you have. And you do more wrong now. You make slurs of me here. Insane? Really? Wow. Proves my claim.

You certainly did ALL the things I've said and likely more. And you won't speak specifically to any point of fact about the problem. Again Laura makes vague and overly synoptic slurs of me and the problem in total. Point of fact remains, this is an image of me and the specific vanity and innuendo of that image speaks for itself. The rest of her offers are factually flawed and logically of no merit to her defense.

My father knew and spoke of Laura's problem earlier on well before 2003 when we parted ways over his crimes done to me. He confirmed what I know to be true, and since I was there, this is my photo. Laura and L&A Canada are wrong. Neither of you can dispute that. Since you have no proof or witness. I do, and I was there and know what I look like. We had mirrors at home when I was a child.

"I purchased the rights to use the image in question from the Library and Archives Canada, who own the original image, which is from a Parisian photographer and which was taken in 1920."

They have no right to market this to you and they are wrong. You have been had Laura. And you make additional efforts to soil the forensic value of this problem and to defend the acts done to me via it. Your other offers prove that slur as being a slur as does your overly hostile want to take task with me. Again who are you?

This is an image of me taken circa 1966. And the bird in question is not the gender or breed you claim it is. You are wrong on both. Canada seems to sense and know this and softens on their problem. They can't defend and only would do so now not to be prosecuted for the problem looking back. Sorry for your loss. I am prosecuting both of you.

So far you prove me right mostly by the tactic and tone you are using. You claim victory based on your offer to remove a page, and as I said before, neither you or the original ISP can act to redact content. I have no complaint from you. And they did not act on one, and neither did I.

I see other sites marketing Nazi hate and denial of Holocaust and those pages are not taken down either.

I moved for other reasons. None of that or your statements so far vindicates you.

Why resort to making slurs? Laura goes on:

"The image has nothing to do with this person. It is not of him. I do not know him."

Correct, you do not know me. And with that you can't defend or offer you know this image is NOT of me. Since it is. And YOU HAVE NO PROOF AND YOU HAVE NO WITNESS LAURA. And I have proof and my father even spoke to your problem making his problem worse. I agree with him and again I was there and you were not. You don't claim this is of you. Hence you have no hope to make a claim. And nobody has the right to sell it to you other than me. And you don't have that right.

I don't sign contracts as a child and you don't have one either certainly since it is an image of a child. Are you sure you spoke to his attorney before you sold it to others? His attorney? You'd have to do that since he has to have one being he can't sign contracts until the age of 18 years. Oops!

Your ancillary behaviours related to resumes and France etc, as my father said, and I can see, speak to vanity of my personal life and make slurs overall to denigrate my character AND to suppress witness related to what this image is about. Child harms and atrocity. The vanity ruins you and you would have been best to stay out of another man's problem for his want to harm his child this way.

Why arrive now to pay for it with them Laura?

Laura you don't know me at all, that is right, BUT you hope to speak against me to protect this problem in other ways. Not knowing me proves you don't know this image either. That does not prove you right overall. Lots of people who don't know me hope to slander me. AND hope to protect the murdering pedophiles who make this mess.

"He refuses to use his real name because he knows I will sue him for character defamation. He uses a false name on his ISP registration, a mail drop mailing address, and the ISP is in Cyprus (despite his mailing info being in Texas.)"

That is inaccurate in total also. I use my real name if and when I decide to do that, this is about privacy Laura, MINE. I am an injured party. You claim to be a biz expert that knows it all and who can make such offers and then steamroll your victims as you do.

As to privacy? Yours you decided to toss asunder as you decide to make this mess this way and then be so proactive to squeel like a banshee that someone stepped on your toe. And you Laura make no effort to establish a proper business and to act according to the laws. Imprudent of you. Then you hope to do what? Talk to someone in Greece and have them redact or remove content for you based on you being who?

In doing business you are best to take more care to protect your personal straw man from the business facade lest you make this mess. You bought it Laura you own it. Proves you the fool now for other reasons.

So far you are the ONLY person who makes such a stink about someone posting content you already and STILL DO SHARE on the web. Remove yours! WHO ARE YOU? Someone special?

Sue me? Impossible. Since all I said so far is true and STILL PRESENT ONLINE in your offers. Problem is all I do is cite YOUR content and indicate it is wrong. What can you do about that? Nothing.

"He uses a false name on his ISP registration, a mail drop mailing address, and the ISP is in Cyprus (despite his mailing info being in Texas.)"

Also inaccurate. More slurs.

The registration is correct and uses my real name. And how I do that is up to me. Why share my real location with criminals like you Laura? ISPs, I use many of them, are all over the planet Laura. I do that for a reason, it is about a forensic problem and is done to make this less convenient for folks to resort to prejudice to get away with crimes as you hoped to do Laura. This ISP also has locations in Germany and other parts of Europe.

So what? Does Cypress somehow prove you right? Why not Germany? How does the location of a site mirror or the content which may actually be on more than one virtual or physical disk volume prove me wrong or you right? Your logic is useless and your claims and facts are false.

"This person is doxxing me, posting my address and phone number. Totally wrong and potentially illegal."

You do that to you Laura. You offer to market this image of me that you have no right to market. Canada has no say in the matter since you are in USA. See how you adopt the vanity of your problem and then accuse me of it? Canada can't protect you and now they lied about it and make claim it is in PD. They can't do that since it is my image.

"Totally wrong and potentially illegal."

Not at all Laura. You are making the illegal act to sell and with that need to account for your sales and word. I am not here to sell you anything. I am here to arrest you. This is how you do "Business", so be it. That is your fault.

"This is totally false. Please remove this immediately."

Won't happen Laura. And now your problem is worse. But in total why bother? All I did is cite your work which is online now. You claim that my offer is false? How? You offer this online and your phone number and locations are as I cite. You are in business right? Ok so be accountable.

Do you realize your other problems related to obsctruction and collusion Laura? I've had 1,000s of felonies done to me personally and have other things I need to do to make this witness and to see it resolved. Your annoyance claims and the rest detract as you plan from that process. Why bother me? Just move forward Laura.

And you hope to make this attack and then rely on that to discredit the whole body of my witness. Nice try. This is the problem with experts like you who hope to assassinate character. This is what you get. Enjoy your mud, pack it on your face.

You make slurs about where I host and why and how. Pathetic. Speaks around the problem. And you claim victory based on a site move, has nothing to do with you. I have no complaint from you via any ISP or court order. Where is it? I moved for technical and forensic reasons.

Now what? Why claim I moved to appease you for claims you never made to or of me?

Why would I since you are wrong and I know it? Laura? You make no sense.

You just proved me right anew AND for additional reasons.

You Laura claim to be able to speak to the horrid abuse this image represents? No you can not. And that vanity matters also.

So does your overly aggressive effort to defend it as you are doing.

Why all the bother?

You stink.

You might have started out by asking a question. As in "Mr X you claim this image is of you?" Are you sure it is a boy?

Odd.

Maybe speak to the sexual and other violent and inappropriate aspects of the image itself, being it is in poor taste overall.

You missed all of that. I don't see you as credible or candid Laura and your callous disregard for this problem proves me right for other reasons.

A hint Laura?

In the future take better care when you market images of children you don't know that depict content that is not totally savory.

Do children smoke? Why the ring? etc.

And plays on length of time (1920 vs 1966) etc being this is long ago etc seem to do as I said you and others do, dismiss the problems and me with it as being not worth your worry.

I'd worry.

Maybe learn to speak Latin Laura. You will need another language or two to start a fight with me.

You lost this one too.

-------------

Problem for Laura and others, is that there are many harms made to me in Canada as a child, and she and others seem to pander on this problem at this point, and then blame me for their tactic to proxy the problem in another nation hoping to leave me with no recourse against them.

Those harms are prosecutable today and this is an effort to botch out on a statute of limitations problem with date/age and jurisdication by location.

I can easily prosecute more of them and not less of them. The more you involve the more that are guilty.

Their inversions of vanity and "Doth Protest Too Much" tactics prove them wrong.

She is too quick to blame someone and to invert vanity.

Then she and others hope to not really barter or deal but to COMPEL a dismissal of the problems and a want to see them informally quashed and the voices of those harmed silenced.

Where is the dialog and discovery for her and others?

-------------

And as to ISP and the rest.

I really don't need to respond or justify my actions to Laura or to anyone else, but her abortions of logic and justice prove her offers as being paranoid and weird at this point.

As to where I live, I might live in New York State (Who is complicit) where this photo is taken but then use web hosting or other resources outside of NY. Why not?

I shop on price, features, design, and other criteria. This provider has issues with outages, blank areas in coverage related to locations outside of Greece, etc and with that I had to move. Since their product is not working. I don't respond to accommodate people who are guilty just since they tell me to shut up about their guilt. Makes sense so far, no?

Facebook and Etsy are not in the same town that Laura Wamelink Haggarty lives in, so I can say same of her. Why use them and they also might claim to be incorporated in Delaware. How rash!

Why offer all that to defend her errant position and acts?

I also am a Stateless person and a victim of horrid crime. I might act a bit more vigorously to defend my privacy than others. And when doing anything, using a secure mail service with complete chain of custody might be in my best interest. Hence another problem for Laura and her histrionic retorts.

Her offers are specious and not a rebut of my offers nor do they prove her right. Finding fault with me does not defend Laura or prove me wrong. I can prove her wrong by her word here and now.

Laura proves overall what is wrong with the people who made and enabled this kind of atrocity ongoing since the 1960's in the small town that I lived in.

For Laura why rely on Canada to do this? Why not just do as my father and mother and their pedophile friends in the law did, and use local children for your perverse photos and drama?

Why use a French (tickler) boy? Joke is on you now.

And her want is to invent all this fraud and then with her mighty word and fist have it all casually dismissed on the wave of her mighty hand. Not so fast. Make it so!

And since you have the breed of the bird and gender of the bird wrong this would indicate you don't know what you are talking about related to raising these kind of animals, and your technical botches prove you incompetent overall in any computing or electronic domain.

As does your offers which are misguided slurs at best with foundations not in fact, and overall whose features won't vindicate or support you and NONE of Laura's offers prove ME wrong.

They prove me right now with additional character aspects that Laura makes the mistake of soiling, hers that is.

A rational adult would at least postulate "Since I have no witness the man might be right".

And how would Canada have any knowledge or authority related to a work ostensibly made in France in 1920?

And for ISP and Canada etc, you need to understand the world is not perfect and more are to blame and not less, and blaming me won't work towards the end of vindicating them. My hosting provider is wrong, so is Canada, so are my parents, so is Laura.

Make sense?

You went out on a limb here for reasons I do not know, you gambled, and you lost Laura. Others will find out WHY you acted to do this along with Canada and any others who are to blame. I can only assume this is done to protect those who did this and that money are motives.

-------------

Wrongful acts of others prove my claim and won't support Laura.

But overall you could pay someone to murder me. Their wrongful act won't prove anyone else right related to me either, nor will it vindicate you.

So much for your ISP claims Laura. As in: Wrong again.

You start to look like Mary Queen of Scots.

Who died and made you a despot owning all the truth in the world Laura?

Get over yourself. You can't speak to what this is or make a claim about my life or witness, EVER.

Ever make an error in life? Here is one even assuming it is your first.

Be an adult Laura and stop acting like a Facebook shill. Ad hominem won't save you. And this is not Facebook. This is real.

A hint, you are in over your head with me. You are not ready for the big leagues.

Seems I struck a nerve. Good.

You claim you have a result based on your acts to prove you wrong by doing what? I have no knowledge of that. You complained before this to who? So what?

All I need is this now.

-------------

And again the notion I had to "Get Dressed" for this event has another nasty connotation about what else was being done to me sexually as a child.

See how you also had to modify that with your "Period Piece" marketing, you can't admit this child was intentionally dressed up this way since we all went around like Peter Pan in the 1960's in Rural NY State. eh? Hence 1920 and France. It was not so.

Anyone who'd harm or torture or kill a child like this, their own, will do same to you and yours, they will lie, steal money, and do other crimes logically.

Your offers and tactic and agenda and ploys are cheap and dirty.

"The image has nothing to do with this person. It is not of him." - Says Laura Wamelink Haggarty.

She can not make that claim and the image is of me. Canada has no say and this gets back to a drowning event in Lake Ontario in Canada.

The want to blame Canada as she might want to start doing now.

And for her and Canada who can not speak to 1920 France, they rely on "The French Connection" and guilt by association.

-------------

The claims are getting less consistent now beyond Laura's and other's wrong doing.

https://theartstack.com....ridgupper&via=pinterest

"Henri Manuel (24 April 1874, Paris – 11 September 1947, Neuilly-sur-Seine) was a Parisian photographer who served as the official photographer of the French government from 1914 to 1944."

Is one claim about this photo, so it was taken in France in Paris in 1920? But he is living in Quebec? But is of this man?

Laura claims this is in Paris, Canada says the photo was made in Quebec, the person doing the photo has same first name as the boy who seems really to be a Canadian Pharmacist who was actually 32 years old in 1920. This is all a lie.

The Mercury connection is odd. It is also about my name, being Terry and NOT Terri. Same first names? Seems more odd. My father's middle name is Henry. This is a fraud in total. Why did Canada not name the person who recorded the photo or who took the setting?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Groulx

[
Henri Groulx (21 May 1888 – 16 July 1952) was a Canadian pharmacist and politician.

Born in Montreal, Quebec, Groulx was educated at the Collège Mont-Saint-Louis, Collège Saint-Laurent and at Université Laval à Montréal. He was a pharmacist since 1914 and owned a pharmacy.[1]

He was elected to the Legislative Assembly of Quebec for Montréal-Outremont in 1939. A Liberal, he was re-elected in 1944, 1948, and 1952. He was a Provincial Secretary (1939-1940), Minister of Health (1939-1941), Minister of Welfare (1940-1941), and Minister of Health and Welfare (1941-1944).[1]

He received an honorary degree in pharmacy from the Université de Montréal on May 30, 1941.[1]

He died on 16 July 1952, the night of the election, in Outremont.[1]
]

http://www.assnat.qc.ca....ri-3531/biographie.html

[
Born in Montreal, in the parish of Sainte-Brigide, may 21, 1888, son of Fabien Groulx, butcher, and Agnes Lalonde.

Studied at the Collège Mont-Saint-Louis, Saint-Laurent College and Laval University in Montreal.

Bachelor of pharmacy since 1914, was the owner of a pharmacy.

A member of the school Board of the catholic schools of Saint-Viateur-d'outremont in 1934 and president from 1935 to 1937. Elected liberal mp in Montréal-Outremont, 1939. Re-elected in 1944, 1948 and 1952. The provincial secretary in the cabinet Godbout, November 8, 1939, to October 16, 1940. In the same firm, also held the post of minister of Health of November 8, 1939 may 13, 1941, minister of social welfare on October 16, 1940 may 13, 1941, minister of Health and social Well-being, may 13, 1941 to August 30, 1944.

President of the pharmaceutical Association of the province of Quebec from 1932 to 1934. Member of the council of the pharmaceutical Association of Canada, of the provincial Board of examiners, the Association of former students of the School of pharmacy, University of Montreal, university Circle and the Chamber of commerce of Montreal. Member of the board of directors of the University of Montreal from 1940 to 1950 and of the academic senate from 1946 to 1950. Appointed doctor honoris causa in pharmacy at the University of Montreal on may 30, 1941.

Died at Outremont, on the evening of his election, on July 16, 1952, at the age of 64 years and 2 months. Buried at Montreal, in the cemetery Notre-Dame-des-Neiges, on July 21, 1952.

Had married, in Outremont, in the parish of St-Viateur, on April 7, 1920, Marguerite Mercury, daughter of Alfred Mercury, general contractor, and Elmire Talbot.
]

Above is translated by Yandex from French to English.

As I said a slur in total.

Since they contradict each other and the facts this proves Canada is wrong since they sold it and Laura is wrong since she admits the sales also and their facts are wrong in total.

They don't agree with each other. And the numbers are wrong etc.

This problem just got deeper and this proves Canada wrong and implicates them in the coverup of the crimes along with Laura and others who market and pander on this problem.

This is the only image I have of my father, seems odd, the one shared on his obit. This is the ONLY photo I have of me other than ones I have made recently and ONLY photo of me as a child. The only child photo of me is that abortion.

None of my mother or anyone else either.

This is a vanity trap. Deeply contrived & akin to the movie and music problems.

A play on names, of the Pharmacist @ Okies Gary Mittlefehldt etc.

Again the vanity too deeply intersects mine.

The features of that vanity and the manipulations of that prove the act of the hand of man, Henri Manuel (Manual) etc.

VS done by computer or by random chance etc. It also dictates and proves time order, the photo follows the bad acts at home. And those won't be present in 1920 in France OR Quebec Canada. They can not have knowledge.

Contrived. Collusion and this is now among many parties and likely Srihari and SUNY Buffalo CEDAR and their "expertise" in forensics and document analysis come to light.

Professional liars and confidence men and women.

And now this is offered as some kind of "majority" opinion that the powerful nation state of Canada is blessing as being something contrary to what it is, that being a photo of me and the abuse I suffered along with the drowning event in Canada where I was known only as John Doe.

Plays on we don't know the culprit or boy's name etc.

Also seems another offer to blame the victim.

I have this right in total. It will be worse than I know and not better.

Laura is wrong and she knows it.

Same for L & A Canada.